Get ASX Price
eWombat Search


Latest Financial Planning News
The revival of the West
The great advisory challenge for team SMSF
Boost for tax data-matching.
Extra Online support from your Financial Planner.
Budget wrap: industry welcomes continuity
Market Update - 30th April 2013
2013-14 Federal Budget at a Glance
Budget 2013-14 Overview
Full version of the Federal Budget speech for 2013-14
Flawed super tax = long-term problems: Mercer
Market Update -  31st March 2013
A matter of confidence
Super tax changes: winners and losers
The big super split
The hot super debate
For those clients who like to do some extra research.
The growing return expectation gap
"EU will survive no problem", US in recovery
Love, money and relationship breakdowns
Reports find risk appetite rising but still reluctant
Market Update - 28th February 2013
Research finds advisers key to SMSF growth
Road-testing retirement
China may run hot, but will investors overheat?
2013 rays of hope
Quarter 1 January - March 2013
Quarter 4 October - December 2012
Quarter 3 July - September 2012
Quarter 2 April - June 2012
Quarter 1 January - March 2012
Quarter 4 October - December 2011
Quarter 3 July - September 2011
Quarter 2 April - June 2011
Quarter 1 January - March 2011
Quarter 4 October - December 2010
Quarter 3 July - September 2010
Quarter 2 April - June 2010
Quarter 1 January - March 2010
Quarter 4 October - December 2009
Quarter 3 July - September 2009
Quarter 2 April - June 2009
Quarter 1 January - March 2009
Quarter 4 October - December 2008
Quarter 3 July - September 2008
Quarter 2 April - June 2008
Quarter 1 January - March 2008
Quarter 4 October - December 2007
Quarter 3 July - September 2007
Personal Credit Ratings
Evaluating a Company’s Management
Super trouble for women
Tips for the prospective Landlord.
Forget those great expectations
Market Updates – 28th February 2010
A matter of age.
Berkshire’s stock splits:  Good buy or Goodbye?
Why no extra contributions? It's no mystery
Stronger growth tipped for Australia
Market Updates – 31st January 2010
Olivers Insights
Historical Asset Class Performance
6 Reasons Why You NEED A Budget
6 Months to a better budget.
Amnesty – Overseas Undeclared Income
The outsiders
Inside self-managed super
Market Update - 31st December 2009
Berkshire’s stock splits:  Good buy or Goodbye?
By Investopedia.com | 22.02.2010
www.CompareShares.com.au  / www.thebull.com.au

People have been trying to emulate Warren Buffett's investing style for decades. A lucky few don't have to worry about that because they own shares of Berkshire Hathaway, so he is essentially working for them. At over $3000 a share, however, putting Mr. Buffett on your payroll was a distant dream for most. So, when Warren Buffett announced a stock split, individual investors became very excited. This meant that shares of Berkshire Hathaway would be affordable for the first time since the Oracle from Omaha started managing Berkshire. We'll look at the magic of stock splits and whether they mark a good time to buy or a good time to say goodbye.
 
What Are They?

A stock split, as the name implies, is essentially the division of the outstanding shares of a company into a greater number of shares. A stock split does not change either the proportional ownership of shareholders in the company or its total shareholders' equity. While a stock split may be done in any ratio at the discretion of the company's Board of Directors, a 2-for-1 (or 2:1) stock split is the most common one, and involves the issuance of one additional share for every outstanding share of the company.

Stocks splits are significant corporate actions that need the prior approval of the company's Board of Directors and its shareholders.

A Sample Split

Consider a company that has 100 million shares outstanding and declares a 2-for-1 split. If the shares are trading at $50 just prior to the split, they will theoretically trade at $25 on the date that the split become effective (called the "ex-split" date). Although the company's outstanding shares will now double to 200 million, its market value or capitalization of $5 billion (i.e. $25 x 200 million) will be unchanged. Likewise, a shareholder who held 1,000 shares before the split, will now own 2,000 shares after the split, but the total value of the shareholder’s holding will be unchanged at $50,000.

Reasons To Split Up

If this action has no discernible effect on shareholders' equity or their proportional ownership, then why do companies expend time and money to split their shares? There are good reasons for stock splits and reverse splits.

Attracting The Small Investor

A stock split is a normal stage in the evolution of a profitable company. A growing company that is increasing revenues and profits will see its stock price appreciate over time, to the point where the price may be considered to be too high for the average retail investor. A stock split brings the share price down to a price where a typical retail investor can afford to buy at least 100 shares. Most investors prefer to buy at least 100 shares of a company because the brokerage commission on buying an odd lot of less than 100 shares is higher on a percentage basis - however, this is only a marginal consideration with the advent of flat rate commissions.

Liquid And Cheap

A stock split, by virtue of increasing the number of shares outstanding, also has the effect of increasing its liquidity. Additionally, a stock split is likely to broaden a company’s investor base because the lower price may attract a larger number of investors.

A stock split is usually viewed bullishly by investors, and the stock's price and trading volume may initially increase as more investors are drawn into the fold when the split occurs. The effects of a stock split fade away quite rapidly, however, as investors turn their attention once again to the company's fundamentals.

In the 1990s, many technology companies routinely split their stocks as they soared and took the Nasdaq Composite index to record heights. But as the boom turned to bust and the Nasdaq index plunged more than 75% during the 2000-02 bear market, stock splits became a thing of the past. Some technology companies even had to resort to reverse splits.

Buffet Doing The Splits

In January 2010, Class B shares of Berkshire Hathaway – the holding company owned by legendary investor Warren Buffett – underwent a 50-for-1 split, bringing the stock price down from about $3,500 to approximately $70. The stock split was not undertaken merely to attract a bigger retail investor following. Warren Buffett was not concerned with attracting retail investors. Berkshire Hathaway's Class A shares trade in the low six figures, and the Class B shares were only introduced in 1996. Rather, Berkshire Hathaway said that the stock split was needed to facilitate its acquisition of railroad company Burlington Northern Santa Fe. The split allows even small holders of Burlington shares to exchange them for Berkshire Hathaway shares if they prefer the latter to cash.

The Bottom Line

Stock splits are akin to optical illusions – they give the impression that things have changed. In reality, splits are only adjustments in the number of shares outstanding, while the company's equity and the value of shareholders' holdings remain unchanged. Although most investors view stock splits as inherently bullish, do not be swayed by this fact alone. The effects of stocks splits are only temporary in nature. Ultimately, the company's business fundamentals will be the true drivers of the stock's value and its future direction.

By CompareShares.com.au – for more articles like this click here.
CompareShares.com.au is Australia’s pre-eminent news and investing site for investors and traders, covering shares, superannuation, property, financial planning strategies and more.

 



20th-February-2010
Get ASX Price

Site by PlannerWeb

Plan Protect is an Authorised Representatives of Godfrey Pembroke Limited, Australian Financial Services Licensee | Registered Office at 105 - 153 Miller Street North Sydney NSW 2060